🔗 Share this article

In a unattributed decision, the U.S. Supreme Court cleared the way for Texas to employ a newly configured congressional map that could add several five additional conservative-tilting districts. The 6-3 order, handed down on Thursday, grants a petition by the state to lift a district court's block that had struck down the redistricting plan in November.

Justices' Explanation

The lower court wrongly interjected itself into an ongoing primary campaign, causing significant confusion and disrupting the delicate federal-state balance in elections, the supreme court said in justifying its action.

The district court had earlier ruled that Texas had likely sorted voters based on their race – a practice known as illegal race-based districting – when it adopted the new maps. It had ordered the state to employ the boundaries created after the last decennial survey for the next year's election.

Sharp Dissent

Through a forcefully written dissenting opinion, Justice Elena Kagan took issue with the court's decision. She contended that it disregarded the work of the district court, observing that its decision was written by a judge appointed by ex-President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan stated in a dissent co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

The justice went on, Today's ruling guarantees that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its enhanced favoritism, will control next year's elections. And it guarantees that many Texas voters, unjustly, will be placed in electoral districts due to their race. And that result, as this court has declared year in and year out, is a infraction of the U.S. Constitution.

Countrywide Redistricting Fight

The ruling occurs during a nationwide contest over the redistricting of electoral maps. Texas is an essential part in campaigns to reshape the U.S. House map to secure a slim Republican hold. Ordinarily, map-drawing occurs after a ten-year survey. Yet the move by Texas Republicans to proceed with a aggressive off-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer set off a chain reaction among other states.

Conservative legislators in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also approved new maps that are estimated to yield several additional Republican-leaning seats. Democrats, for their part, have countered with new maps in including California and Virginia, which could offset those potential gains.

Political Responses

The Texas top lawyer praised the supreme court ruling. In a statement, he said the order defended Texas's prerogative to draw a map that guarantees representation aligned with his party. Texas is paving the way as we take our country back, district by district, state by state, he remarked.

In contrast, Democratic leaders decried the ruling. It is deeply disheartening that the Court has endorsed this severely racially gerrymandered plan from Texas Republicans, said the head of a major party election organization.

A leading Democratic leader said the court had another time eroded its credibility by rubber-stamping a discriminatory map. This decision from the Court's far-right bloc proves extremists are willing to rig elections. The Texas map is a discriminatory power grab targeting Black and Latino voters, he added.